Family of four will spend $6.75 more weekly on food in 2013
Posted on Sep 11, 2012
The cost is calculated by the Upper Saddle River, NJ-based trade association using USDA's latest food price projections for 2013, indicate prices for food-at-home will increase as much as 4.0% next year, with food away-from-home prices projected to rise as much as 3.5%. Food Institute members can find the complete breakdown by category at www.foodinstitute.com/outlook.cfm. The Food Institute combined the recent USDA figures for 2013 with its annual book, the Demographics of Consumer Food Spending, which relies on data from the BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS to forecast 2013 household food spending.
A breakdown by department shows most of the increase will be spent at meat counters, where annual costs are seen rising about $44 next year for a family of four, and about $30 for a two-person households, according to The Food Institute's estimates. Beef costs would account for nearly one-third of that increase. Fresh produce prices will add another $23.44 to a family's grocery bill next year, but processed fruit and vegetable expenditures should go up only about $11, The Food Institute projects. Canners and freezers may take note of this opportunity to promote their products. And for those families eating away-from-home; two-person households will be spending an average $86.73 more next year, with a family of four spending an additional $125. However, as is always the case with food, these spending projections could vary as substitutions are made in one category or another. Consumers could opt to spend more on canned and frozen products to offset higher prices for fresh; or buy poultry instead of higher-priced beef. Other discounts offered by manufacturers and retailers, including coupons could impact expenditures as well. Stay tuned to The Food Institute as the impact of this year's drought plays out.
Source: Press release courtesy of the Food Institute
Tagged Post Topics Include: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Drought 2012, Economics, Food Institute, USDA
Comments